Ford of Germany marketed a model named Scorpio from 1985 to 1998. There were two versions, the second of which, sometimes called Scorpio II, was produced 1994-98. Wikipedia provides background information here.
As of the time this post was drafted, there was a Wikipedia entry section noting that Scorpio II styling was criticized be several noted car buffs who proclaimed the design ugly. I would not go that far. To me, it was nondescript in the soft, aerodynamic sort of way seen from the mid-1980s unto the early 2000s.
Here it is, placed in some contexts.
Gallery
The Scorpio II sedan (there also was a station wagon / break version) was a six-window affair with a low, rounded nose. I don't notice a large chin air dam, and the spoiler on the trunk lid is quite small. Given that Ford was into aerodynamic efficiency ten years earlier, I find the modesty of these details puzzling.
Front end. Soft, and not cluttered like current cars.
Two views of the rear. Again, large-radius rounding that might have pleased General Motors' Harley Earl in his heyday. The wide tail light / reflector assembly is clean with a dab of variety in the width of the upper framing strip. See how modest the spoiler is.
This rear view is of a 1985 Ford Tempo, the company's first American compact car with proper aerodynamic basic body shaping. It considerably predates the Scorpio II. Its front has a chin air dam, but there is no trunk lid spoiler. It too is a six-window sedan with a simple rear-end design that is less rounded.
General view of a 1985 Tempo.
1992 Mazda 929 ("Sentia" in some parts of the world). Ford had ties with Mazda in those days, but I don't know how much that might have extended to styling. This is a four-window sedan, but it has a rounded, spoiler-free trunk lid.
Now for the front. Here is a Cadillac Deville from the early 2000s. The hood is more raised and sculpted than that of the '94 Scorpio II. Otherwise, the shape of the grille is reminiscent of Scorpio's and the headlight assemblies' overall shape in quite similar. Again, a soft, uncluttered design.
Ford of Germany marketed a model named Scorpio from 1985 to 1998. There were two versions, the second of which, sometimes called Scorpio II, was produced 1994-98. Wikipedia provides background information here.
As of the time this post was drafted, there was a Wikipedia entry section noting that Scorpio II styling was criticized be several noted car buffs who proclaimed the design ugly. I would not go that far. To me, it was nondescript in the soft, aerodynamic sort of way seen from the mid-1980s unto the early 2000s.
Here it is, placed in some contexts.
Gallery
The Scorpio II sedan (there also was a station wagon / break version) was a six-window affair with a low, rounded nose. I don't notice a large chin air dam, and the spoiler on the trunk lid is quite small. Given that Ford was into aerodynamic efficiency ten years earlier, I find the modesty of these details puzzling.
Front end. Soft, and not cluttered like current cars.
Two views of the rear. Again, large-radius rounding that might have pleased General Motors' Harley Earl in his heyday. The wide tail light / reflector assembly is clean with a dab of variety in the width of the upper framing strip. See how modest the spoiler is.
This rear view is of a 1985 Ford Tempo, the company's first American compact car with proper aerodynamic basic body shaping. It considerably predates the Scorpio II. Its front has a chin air dam, but there is no trunk lid spoiler. It too is a six-window sedan with a simple rear-end design that is less rounded.
General view of a 1985 Tempo.
1992 Mazda 929 ("Sentia" in some parts of the world). Ford had ties with Mazda in those days, but I don't know how much that might have extended to styling. This is a four-window sedan, but it has a rounded, spoiler-free trunk lid.
Now for the front. Here is a Cadillac Deville from the early 2000s. The hood is more raised and sculpted than that of the '94 Scorpio II. Otherwise, the shape of the grille is reminiscent of Scorpio's and the headlight assemblies' overall shape in quite similar. Again, a soft, uncluttered design.
EmoticonEmoticon